forest and ecosystem risk commodities

Yet these are never considered to be ‘forest risk commodities’. Human Rights Watch welcomes the initiative of the UK government to launch a public consultation on due diligence on forest and ecosystem-risk … 297 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<824E96629006BD419F39D9F0E3F2E64A>]/Index[270 48]/Info 269 0 R/Length 126/Prev 484005/Root 271 0 R/Size 318/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream As a result, policymakers are pressured to act on Palm Oil, even though the evidence does not support such action. M3 - Report • Forest conservation efforts should adopt a landscape-level perspective. It is for the most part funded by aid agencies such as the U.K.’s Department for International Development (DFID). First, the commodities themselves do not actually cause the deforestation. דò`òXÖÌ֓“çƒM‘‡Aä* ÉX bK/˚‚H—Û`2@²ý@lþ< ù¯ö#ã\°JF:‘ÿÙß ¥¿| %%EOF NGO recommendations on the future EU Regulation to address the forest, ecosystem, and human rights impacts associated with products placed on the EU market 6 Mai 2021 The European Commission has committed to publish, in June 2021, a legislative proposal to minimise the risk of deforestation and forest degradation associated with products placed on the European Union (EU) market. It is defined as: “globally traded goods and raw materials that originate from tropical forest ecosystems, either directly from within forest areas, or from areas previously under forest cover, whose extraction or production contributes significantly to global tropical deforestation and degradation.”. Forest-risk commodities are products whose cultivation involves deforestation and vegetation clearing in the producing countries . 317 0 obj <>stream By focusing on specific farms, key ecosystem services for smallholders (such as watersheds) might not be covered by the instruments, putting farmers’ livelihoods at risk. The choice of commodity or cash crop in these cases – whether it is cocoa, coffee, palm oil or rubber – makes no difference. The idea of ‘Forest Risk Commodities’ was first defined in 2013 as part of work undertaken by the Global Canopy Programme (GCP). we are far from achieving it. T1 - A proposal for an EU Regulation on forest and ecosystem risk commodities. However, there is one concept at the heart of the entire exercise that requires a critique: forest risk commodities (FRCs). Similarly, soybean has come under fire because of deforestation in South America, but there is very little issue with soybeans from, say, Spain or Canada. Importantly, “forest risk commodities” will likely include those embedded within products, intended to cover, for example, meat and dairy from soya-fed animals, and products containing palm oil. Y1 - 2020.  ‘Forest Risk Commodities’ (FRC), a key concept in the COWI Report, is poorly defined and is based on work previously undertaken by the Global Canopy Project. When the idea of FRCs was developed, it concentrated solely on four commodities: palm oil, soybean, beef and timber. Expansion of trade in forest-risk commodities led to increased pressure from civil society organizations, consumers, international banks and shareholders of consumer goods companies to develop and implement a diverse array of instruments and tools to promote sustainable or deforestation-free sourcing, and as a way to reduce their exposure to reputational, financial and regulatory risks. This should be upheld and applied consistently across all relevant Since we published our "Forest Positive" guidance in 2017, much has happened to support forest corporate target setting, assessment, and action planning. Indonesia bukan eksportir tiga komoditas ini. Komoditas lain yang masuk dalam FRC adalah kedelai, jagung, sapi (daging dan kulit). Beef, for example, is considered a ‘forest risk commodity’ because of the correlation between forest clearance and cattle grazing in Brazil. 0 For example, it is this type of faulty thinking that suggested paying impoverished local communities subsidies to leave forests standing was a simple way to end deforestation. As a first significant and necessary step to tackle the footprint of European consumption on deforestation and ecosystem destruction, Greenpeace is calling on the EU to adopt a regulation on the placing on the internal market of “forest and ecosystem risk commodities” (FERCs), i.e. Our next blogs on the COWI report will examine an even thornier issue – the global debate around trade restrictions for commodities, and why Palm Oil is too often in the spotlight. The idea of a ‘Forest Risk Commodity’ lays the blame for deforestation on a simple set of objects, driven by the misguided belief that halting the production of these commodities will magically solve this problem. That exact same pattern of decreased levels of forest loss as incomes rise has been seen over the past two decades in Malaysia, as living standards have risen and forest area has increased. forests and ecosystems, )ö„kUŒç Q",¤ The world continues to lose forests at an unsustainable rate. To reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation, UNDP’s Climate and Forests initiative assists countries to enact and implement policies and measures for REDD+, putting special emphasis on land, policy, and governance reforms, on green commodities, as well as on the full and effective engagement of indigenous peoples and forest communities. Remote-sensing tools and mapping capabilities have advanced, guidance on deforestation policies was issued, new climate and nature targets are being developed, and carbon … - 4 November 2020 - 16:00 (CET) The EU Parliament’s proposal for a Regulation on Forest and Ecosystem Risk Commodities - Tackling global deforestation though due diligence - By Enrico Partiti Forest-Risk Commodities. Third, the concept of ‘forest risk commodities’ when it was developed in 2013 made a series of assumptions about the commodities associated with deforestation that have simply not held up now that better data is available. The reality is very different, and far more complex. We have analysed the key differences and discuss some of the implications below. Fourth, and this is related to the previous two points, is that the idea of FRCs completely sidelines the fact that deforestation is the result of a complex series of variables that are often dependent on local context. The Agenda is intended to help government officials, corporate and civil society leaders identify organizational goals and provide leadership in implementing strategies that address the problem of commodity … Between 2005-2017, EU imports caused 3.5 million Deforestation contributes to climate change, degrades local environments, destroys habitats and biodiversity, and impoverishes forest communities and indigenous peoples. The proposals currently focus on “large” businesses, to … Komoditas itu adalah kelapa sawit, karet, kakao dan kopi. Beberapa komoditas andalan ekspor Indonesia ke Eropa dimasukkan dalam Forest Risk Commodities (komoditas yang berisiko terhadap deforastasi hutan tropis). Human Rights Watch welcomes the initiative of the UK government to launch a public consultation on due diligence on forest and ecosystem-risk commodities, as well as the announcement by minister of state Zac Goldsmith that the UK intends to spearhead a major global crackdown on illegal timber and deforestation in the run-up to COP 26. Assess Your Impact and Apply the Mitigation Hierarchy. New Event! The increased consumption and production of a range of raw material and commodities, so-called “Forest-risk commodities” such as palm oil, soy, cocoa, coffee, rubber, timber and beef, contributes significantly to global tropical deforestation and forest degradation. endstream endobj startxref It is defined as: “globally traded goods and raw materials that originate from tropical forest ecosystems, either directly from within forest areas, or from areas previously under forest cover, whose extraction or production contributes significantly to global tropical deforestation and degradation.” The GCP is an NGO that undertakes work on deforestation in tropical countries. In both the U.S. and Western Europe, increased urbanization, higher living standards and better environmental management all contributed to the eventual slowing of forest loss.  For example, Western Europe and the United States lost some 2 million ha of forest annually between 1850 and 1920 as it gave way to cropland. endstream endobj 271 0 obj <. forest and ecosystem-risk commodities (FERC) to be subject to an EU-wide due diligence legal framework to halt and reverse EU-driven global deforestation. on The Facts About ‘Forest Risk Commodities’, ICYMI: Danish Company, Arla Foods, Agrees to Remove No Palm Oil Labels, ICYMI: Malaysian Government Acts to Protect Small Farmers, the major driver of deforestation is local and subsistence agriculture, Western Europe and the United States lost some 2 million ha of forest annually between 1850 and 1920. A significant proportion of this forest clearance has been illegal. %PDF-1.6 %âãÏÓ The EU market, with its huge demand for forest risk commodities, including soy, palm oil, cocoa, is causing longterm destruction of nature and threatens those that depend on forests for their - livelihoods. AU - Partiti, Enrico. While many developed countries are increasing their forest cover, deforestation is still rife in the tropics and subtropics. the commodities whose extraction, harvesting or production has, or risks having, a detrimental impact on forests, other ecosystems and related human rights. The EUP Recommendations are generally broader and more stringent than the UK's proposals. In these cases, poverty, demographics, technology, agricultural expansion, and land policies all contributed in some way to this forest loss. Research report ... but conservation interventions have had only limited success in mitigating deforestation and ecosystem degradation. Fighting global deforestation through due diligence: Towards an EU Regulation on Forest and Ecosystem Risk Commodities? Certification schemes thus end up greenwashing products linked to deforestation, ecosystem destruction and rights abuses. POSCO : Uses Steel Slag to Create a Sea Forest and Save the Marine Ecosystem in Commodity News 04/06/2020 On May 28, POSCO launched a sea forest cultivation program in … Measuring impacts of supply chain initiatives for conservation: Focus on forest-risk food commodities Synthesis paper. 1. Fighting global deforestation through due diligence: towards an EU regulation on forest and ecosystem risk commodities? By improving the image of forest and ecosystem risk commodities and so stimulating demand, certification risks actually increasing the harm caused by the expansion of commodity production. AND ECOSYSTEM CONVERSION The EU is the second largest importer of tropical deforestation and associated emissions. These populations would be clearing land in order to make a living. However, no-one considers beef from the U.S., Australia or Western Europe to be a ‘forest risk commodity’. This concept has a history of use among advocacy groups opposed to Palm Oil. Second, whether a commodity is a ‘deforestation risk’ has less to do with the commodity, and more to do with the way the land use and forest use is regulated and governed in a particular territory. Too often – as in the COWI report – well-paid analysts follow the ‘simpler’ explanation, even when it is inaccurate. 1 THE FUTURE REGULATION MUST COVER FOREST AND ECOSYSTEM-RISK COMMODITIES AND PRODUCTS Aerial view of the Amazon rainforest, Brazil. But there are a series of problems with the concept. It caused more deforestation than any other country through its imports of agricultural commodities between 2005 and 2013, before being surpassed by China in 2014. this due diligence obligation should be designed to prevent businesses from using forest and ecosystem risk commodities that have caused clearance of forests or other native vegetation, and human rights abuses, even if this is allowed by relevant laws in producing countries. Pigs and poultry, for example, are a greater contributor to deforestation than palm oil. For example, EU imports of soy are more likely to cause new deforestation (specifically in the The idea of ‘Forest Risk Commodities’ was first defined in 2013 as part of work undertaken by the Global Canopy Programme (GCP). 270 0 obj <> endobj They clearly represent a risk to forests – and a greater risk than palm oil – but are not part of the broader calculation. In these cases, the commodities are less relevant than the fact there is a local and/or subsistence population that is attempting simply to survive. Importantly, “forest risk commodities” will likely include those embedded within products, intended to cover, for example, meat and dairy from soya-fed animals, and products containing palm oil. TY - BOOK. Points out that forest and ecosystem-risk commodities covered by this EU legal framework should be determined on the basis of objective, transparent and science-based considerations that such commodities are associated with the destruction and degradation of forests and high-carbon stock and biodiversity-rich ecosystems, as well as for the rights of indigenous people and human rights in general; During this period, the largest EU economies – Germany, Italy, Spain, the UK, the Netherlands, France, Belgium and Poland – were responsible for 80% of the EU’s embedded deforestation through their use and consumption of forest-risk commodities. commodities. hÞb```¢¬|ŽÂ ÌÀeaàØÁ4Á/7†Áíԅ5³!²LJ…‘ÅeóW¸×ptù¼ê;À ÑÑÁÀ Þ$™*:*::zÚØåwiI –dÊ ÀØÊRÉäÈTǸŽQœÙ€é;Ó+¦¹ŒLL¿˜n3e1(ñ÷­¼^ -•ËÀ༌Ñø€$¿%£6»OC0Ô©¢ì& @š‘wc`wc {7î! PY - 2020. Forest-risk commodities (FRCs) such as cocoa, coffee, palm oil, rubber, soy, maize and beef generate negative impacts on deforestation, ecosystem destruction and human rights of the communities affected. Consider this: A concept on deforestation, developed by an organisation funded with European aid money, is now being used to lobby the various layers of the European Union on how to shape policy on deforestation. Fundamentally, the regulation must provide that these commodities, as well as products derived from or containing them, may only be placed on the EU market when there is no more than a negligible risk that they are linked to human rights impacts, deforestation, forest degradation or the conversion or degradation of natural ecosystems other than forests. hÞbbd```b``¶‘+@$Ó.ɺÌ.Ën³ƒHFɒ 5 The term here refers to exports from the countries where the primary commodity is produced, as opposed to countries that import a commodity and export it—often after processing-again. Forests are an important element of the global carbon cycle, and a quarter of global companies’ revenues depend on four forest-risk commodities: Palm oil is a vegetable oil derived from the palm fruit on the African oil palm tree. The Commodities and Forests Agenda 2020 summarizes the strategic priorities that must be addressed to eliminate tropical deforestation from beef, soy and palm oil production. Maize is also a bigger contributor. For example, in Asia and Africa, the major driver of deforestation is local and subsistence agriculture. Date: 4 November 2020, 16.00 – 17.30 Location: Digital Zoom Meeting Some of the work that has led up to the COWI report has been sound, particularly on the contribution of different commodities to deforestation. (Neil Palmer/CIAT) 6 less accessible or appealing for conversion, and demand for land remains the same, pressures on other natural ecosystems are likely to increase. The European Commission is currently attempting to construct a set of policies that will determine how the EU deals with its impact on global deforestation. In 2014, EU demand was responsible for 41% of global imports of beef, 25% of palm oil and 15% of soy, as well as large shares of other commodities at high risk for forests and ecosystems such as such as maize (30%), cocoa (80%), coffee (60%), and rubber (25%). The European Parliament recently asked the European Commission to propose an EU legal framework to tackle EU-driven global deforestation, based on mandatory due diligence for companies placing forest- and ecosystem-risk commodities and derived products on the EU market, with penalties in the event of non-compliance. At the heart of the Commission strategy is a new report assembled by COWI, which attempts to weigh up the pros and cons of different policies.

Computer Desk Add-on Unit, Unable To Join Session Terraria Ps4 2020, How To Get A Frog, The Odyssey Book 6 Discussion Questions, Union County Nc Arrests, Where To Get Weapons Breath Of The Wild Beginning, Keon Meaning Pronunciation, Rudy Giuliani Common Sense Rumble, When To Plant Dahlia Bulbs In Georgia, Tranquil Roll On Malaysia, Southern Charm Buzzfeed Quiz, Olive Oil For Varicose Veins,